Skip to content

What I Know About Sizing

I heard a rumour recently that the Australian government are considering researching and then issuing standardised sizing in Australia. Admittedly, I find it entertaining that in my wardrobe I have everything from a size 6 to a 12 and 26 to 30 in the denim department. This isn’t a weight thing – they all fit right now. In fact, the 30 is snug and the 26 is loose. Go figure.

Anyway. When the sizing decision had to be made for Bento – not just how we were going to measure things but what we were going to call those sizes, I asked everyone I could think of. I wrote to Bloomingdales in the US. I asked our blog readers, Facebook fans, strangers at parties and my family. What this ultimately ended in is that Bento is sized on a 1, 2, 3, 4 scale – not 8, 10, 12 (AU and UK), 2, 4, 6 (US), 3, 5, 7 (Japan) or anything else.

This is for a few reasons. One, it’s easy to tell what is bigger or smaller than anything else. A 2 is bigger than a 1. So it’s fairly universal. Two, it’s hard for women to get caught up on what size they “should” be and instead focus on what looks good when the sizes are just relative to each other.

In all honesty, this has been a bit of an issue. Manufacturers really don’t like you messing about with the system. When they can’t see it, people get confused and want to convert the sizing to something they know.

Here’s the kicker though… when people see Bento in person – they want it. This has always been the case. The quality, cut and longevity speaks for itself. In person, the sizing system suddenly makes sense. Customers don’t get fixated on the fact they’re used to being a size 12. They try things and look at the fit and the cut and how it feels rather than some arbitrary number. It becomes far more like a personalised, handmade experience from years gone by than the ‘off the rack’ system we’re used to.

Of course, fundamentally it’s not any different… it’s just about getting past a barrier we’ve become used to and focusing on what’s important.

With all this in mind, I can’t decide if I’m for or against standardised sizing. As long as a label can sort out their own sizing and stay true to that, does it really matter what it’s called?

But what do you think? Should we have one system of sizing in Australia? And if so, should it be compulsory?

Sam

2 Comments Post a comment
  1. Hi Sam,

    I understand the use of your current system, but if every company selling clothing in Australia had a standardsized approach (and therefore ridding the country of vanity sizing), then consumers wouldn’t get “fixated on the fact they’re used to being a size 12″ and “focus on what looks good when the sizes are just relative to each other”.

    It would also make online shopping a lot easier (and more environmentally friendly due to less returns).

    Cheers

    James

    November 7, 2011
    • sam @ bento #

      Any issue with shopping online being difficult due to sizing is down to poor descriptions and sizing guides, not the number on the tag.

      I also find that when people don’t have a number to work with, they buy what fits – not what they think they should wear.

      Case in point: a few days ago, a customer who is a size 12 bought something in a size 2 from us (rough equivilent, 8 – 10). It didn’t fit her the way I’d intended, but it looked great. If there was standardised sizing and she knew it wasn’t what I’d designed, would she still have bought it? I don’t know… but I doubt she would have tried it in the first place.

      November 8, 2011

Leave a Reply

You may use basic HTML in your comments. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS